Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Writing proficiency remains a major challenge for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, particularly in managing macro-level organizational aspects such as unity and coherence. Although previous studies have generally treated these constructs as complementary components of writing quality, limited research has examined them as distinct yet interconnected competencies. This study aims to investigate how Grade X vocational students at SMK TKM Teknik Purworejo realize unity and coherence in recount writing and to identify their proficiency profiles. This study employed a descriptive qualitative design involving 34 student recount texts analyzed using a validated analytical checklist focusing on thematic consistency, logical sequencing, tense consistency, and cohesive device use. The findings reveal an imbalance between unity and coherence. Most students were able to maintain thematic focus and sustain a central idea throughout their texts. However, many experienced difficulties in constructing coherent discourse, particularly in connecting ideas logically, maintaining smooth progression, and using cohesive devices effectively. Common problems included overreliance on simple temporal conjunctions, limited lexical cohesion, and fragmented narrative flow. The findings suggest that coherence requires more complex linguistic and cognitive skills than unity. This study contributes to EFL writing research by providing insight into discourse-level writing competence in a vocational context and highlighting the importance of teaching coherence explicitly in writing instruction.

Keywords

Coherence Cohesion EFL Writing Recount Text Unity

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Fadilah, H., Rokhayati, T., & Triana, J. (2026). Discourse-Level Writing Competence in EFL: Unity and Coherence in Recount Texts. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i3.442
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agustini, M. A. D., Ramendra, D. P., & Adnyani, L. P. S. (2025). Analysis of Coherence and Cohesion in Paragraphs Writing of EFL Students. Journal of Educational Study, 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v5i1.966
  2. Ahmed, F. E. Y. (2019). Errors of Unity and Coherence in Saudi Arabian EFL University Students’ Written Paragraph: A Case Study of College of Science and Arts, Tanumah, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(3), 129–130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.321555
  3. Ahmed, F. E. Y., Ahmed, Z. A. D. A., Ali, E. H. F., & Hamed, S. O. E. (2024). Maintaining Unity in the Descriptive Paragraph Writing of Saudi EFL University Students: Challenges and Remedies. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 15(1), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no1.15
  4. Alqasham, F. H. (2021). Coherence and Cohesion in Saudi EFL Learners’ Essay Writing: A Study at a Tertiary-Level Institution. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1.1), 8–25.
  5. Alsariera, A. H., & Yunus, K. (2023). Issues and challenges in the use of coherence among Jordanian EFL students in writing academic essays. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp141-156
  6. Altun, M. (2023). Developing Writing Abilities in L2: A Review. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i2p175
  7. Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text Types in English (Vol. 2). Macmillan Education AU. https://books.google.com/books/about/Text_Types_in_English.html?hl=id&id=FThxcN8F66QC
  8. Anindita, W. K. (2024). Cohesion and Coherence Problems Among Non-Native English Students’ Writing Essays. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 14(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.14.1.2024.58-79
  9. Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.858
  10. Bukhari, S. S. F. (2016). Mind Mapping Techniques to Enhance EFL Writing Skill. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 4(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v4n1a7
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Resesarch Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  12. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2016.01.003
  13. Dasril, Zaim, M., & Ningsih, K. (2019). Coherence and Unity of Students’ Writing on Background of the Study of Research Proposal. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 335, 399–404. https://doi.org/10.2991/icesshum-19.2019.65
  14. Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Teaching_Language_in_Context.html?hl=id&id=_mzUjwEACAAJ
  15. Dwijayanti, P., & Purnama, S. (2020). The Coherence and Unity in Writing Descriptive Text. INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.30998/inference.v3i2.6012
  16. Fitria, N., Muchsin, Zahra, C. M., Usman, M., & Usman, B. (2021). Exploring Strategies to Foster Cohesion And Coherence in EFL Writing: A Focus on Simple View of Writing. Sosiohumaniora Kodepena Information Center for Indonesian Social Sciences, 5(1), 62–72.
  17. Graham, S. (2018). A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing. Educational Psychologist, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
  18. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman Group Limited London.
  19. Harunasari, S. Y. (2023). Examining the Effectiveness of AI-integrated Approach in EFL Writing: A Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 39(2), 357. https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v39.2.5516
  20. Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
  22. Kuni Hikmah Hidayati. (2018). Teaching Writing to EFL Learners: An Investigation of Challenges Confronted by Indonesian Teachers. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 4(1), 21–31.
  23. Leli, L. (2020). Analysis of Coherence and Cohesion on Students’ Academic Writing: A Case Study at the 3rd Year students at English Education Program. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 3(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v3i2.980
  24. Lestari, R. D., Novari, A. F., & Riandi, R. (2022). An Analysis of Students Writing Skill in Recount Text at the Tenth Grade of SMAN 1 Panggarangan Lebak-Banten. Journal of English Language Learning, 6(2), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v6i2.3636
  25. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publication Inc.
  26. Mohseni, A., & Samadian, S. (2019). Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence in Writing Performance of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 8(2), 213–242.
  27. Nhung, L. T. K., & Hiep, N. H. (2023). The Effects of Thematic Progression in Improving Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Writing. English Language Teaching, 16(6), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n6p126
  28. Siska, A., Ilma, R., & Desvitasari, D. (2025). Writing Recount Text in the Efl Classroom: an Analysis of Students’ Common Difficulties. Wiralodra English Journal, 9(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v9i2.461
  29. Soomro, B., Shah, Z. A., & Chachar, Z. A. (2025). Exploring challenges in unity and coherence in paragraph writing by ESL university students in Pakistan. UW Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.56220/uwjss.v8i2.189
  30. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Togatorop, F., & Saragih, D. Y. (2024). An Analysis Of Coherence And Unity In Writing Descriptive Paragraph. Journal on Education, 07(1), 2701–2710. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.6844
  32. Wakerkwa, D. A. P., & Astuti, D. A. (2025). Patterns and Problems of Coherence in EFL Students ’ Essays. Musamus Journal of Language and Literature, 07(02), 332–339.
  33. Widhiyanto, W., Hendrawaty, N., Suryani, L., & Pratama, M. R. A. (2023). An Analysis of the Abstracts of EFL Undergraduate Students: Coherence and Cohesion. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 250. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.18102
  34. Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2006). The teaching of EFL writing in the Indonesian context: The state of the art. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(3), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v13i3.40