Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine patterns of personal experience representation in undergraduate students’ narrative writing, focusing on (1) language choice, including diction, register, and personalization, and (2) story plot structure, encompassing chronological plots, flashbacks, and narrative turning points. The study employs a descriptive quantitative design using quantitative content analysis of students’ narrative texts. Each text was analyzed using a structured coding scheme that classified linguistic features. The study has several limitations, including a relatively small sample size and a context limited to a single institution. The sample consisted of 30 undergraduate students from the English Language Education program at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar (N = 30). Data were drawn from one study program and one institution only, and the analysis focused on narrative text products without in-depth exploration of students’ cognitive writing processes, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Data were collected through quantitative content analysis of 30 narrative writing tasks, supplemented by a short reflective questionnaire. The results reveal two dominant patterns. First, the use of highly interpersonal language, characterized by frequent first-person pronouns and emotional expressions, is positively correlated with retrospective plots or flashbacks. Second, the use of formal–descriptive language tends to be associated with linear chronological plots. The novelty of this research lies in its systematic and measurable identification of the relationship between language choice and plot structure as patterns of students’ personal experience representation, rather than treating linguistic features or narrative structures as isolated characteristics, as commonly found in previous studies. Practically, these findings imply the need for narrative writing instruction in higher education that explicitly links language choice with plot development through reflective writing tasks, practice with varied narrative structures, and rubric-based feedback to enhance the quality, coherence, and depth of students’ narratives.

Keywords

Language Choice Narrative Writing Personal Experience Story Plot

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Ramly, J., & Asnidar , A. (2026). Representing Personal Experiences in EFL Students’ Narrative Writing: Language Choice and Plot Structural Patterns. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i1.348
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adler, J. M., Lodi-Smith, J., Philippe, F. L., & Houle, I. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. 2(20), 142–175.
  2. Ajabshir, Z. F. (2024). Empowering EFL writing through digital storytelling: A quasi-experimental assessment of CALF measures and multidimensional engagement. Acta Psychologica, 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104564
  3. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2021). (t.t.). Corpus linguistics and grammar teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  4. Briesmaster, M., & Etchegaray, P. (2017). Coherence and cohesion in EFL students’ writing production: The impact of a metacognition-based intervention. Ikala, 22(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n02a02
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  7. De Fina, A. (2015). Narrative and identities. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch18
  8. Egbert, J., & Baker, P. (2019). Using corpus methods to triangulate qualitative and quantitative analyses. 2(15), 335-365.
  9. Enayat, M. J. (2025). Computationally derived linguistic features of L2 narrative essays and their relations to human-judged writing quality. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00374-9
  10. Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  11. Hyland, K. (2021). (t.t.). Second language writing (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108786957
  12. Krippendorff, K. (2022). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Lee, J. (2020). Writer voice and identity in EFL personal narratives.
  14. McAdams, D. P. (2018). Narrative Identity: What Is It? What Does It Do? How Do You Measure It? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618756704
  15. McAdams, D. P., & Guo, J. (2022). Narrating the self in everyday life. 2(90), 345–359.
  16. McEnery, T., & Hardy, A. (2019). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. In Cambridge Textbooks in Lingusitics. Retrieved from www.cambridge.org
  17. McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2015). Linguistic features of writing quality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773367
  18. Refnaldi, R., & Fitrawati, F. (2023). Linguistic features and narrative structure in EFL students’ pribadi narrative writing. 2(19), 1123–1139.
  19. Yang, Y.-T. C., & Wu, W.-C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352.