Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a logical and comprehensive systematic review of MA students’ theses related to professional development (PD) in an educational institution in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. This systematic review used a qualitative method to analyze 28 unpublished PD theses (2010 – 2020) in a graduate program of a public tertiary institution in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. There were four main research concerns, including (1) research aims, (2) research methodology, (3) findings, and (4) limitations of the theses. After the review, a list of strengths and weaknesses of these studies is found, evaluated, and presented in this article. The review shows that these studies did contribute diverse knowledge and practices of PD in the educational system of Vietnam, particularly in the Mekong Delta. On the other hand, the data collection instruments and research designs needed improvement to a certain extent. Specifically, observations were not used much in the theses. Besides, the candidate researchers overused a descriptive research design for their theses. Thanks to the analysis, some implications and new ideas for further research in PD are discussed at the end of this paper.


.

Keywords

EFL Teachers Master Theses Mekong Delta Professional Development Systematic Review

Article Details

How to Cite
Le, T. T., & Le, X. M. (2022). A Decade of Researching on Professional Development in a Graduate Program: A Systematic Review. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v3i1.78

References

  1. Anastas, J. (2000). Research Design for Social Work and the Human Services. Columbia University Press.
  2. ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint. Jakarta: Author.
  3. Author (2020)
  4. Bailey, K. M. (2001). Twenty Questions about Action Research. PASAA: A Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 32, 1-18.
  5. Bayar, A. & Kösterelioğlu, İ. (2014). Satisfaction Levels of Teachers in Professional Development Activities in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 9(2), 321-333.
  6. Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T. (2004). A Longitudinal Study of Teacher Change: What Makes Professional Development Effective?. Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 45-68.
  7. Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of Professional Development on Teacher Practice: Uncovering Connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599-607.
  8. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). The Problem of Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 295-300.
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Target Time Toward Teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 20(2), 31-36.
  10. Duke, D. L. (2004). The Challenges of Educational Change. Allyn & Bacon.
  11. Earley, P., & Porritt, V. (2014). Evaluating the Impact of Professional Development: The Need for a Student-Focused Approach. Professional Development in Education, 40(1), 112-129.
  12. Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(2), 14-23.
  13. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1992). Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals. Longman Publishing Group, 95 Church Street, White Plains, NY 10601.
  14. Ganser, T. (2000). An Ambitious Vision of Professional Development for Teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 84(618), 6-12.
  15. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
  16. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin press.
  17. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
  18. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Understanding Teacher Development. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.
  19. Helterbran, V. R., & Fennimore, B. S. (2003). Collaborative Early Childhood Professional Development: Building from a Base of Teacher Investigation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 4(31), 267-271.
  20. Le, V. C., Nguyen, H.T.M., Minh, N.T.T., & Barnard, R. (Eds.). (2019). Building Teacher Capacity in English Language Teaching in Vietnam: Research, Policy and Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457371
  21. Leisyte, L., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2014). Stakeholders and Quality Assurance in Higher Education. In Drivers and Barriers to Achieving Quality in Higher Education (pp. 83-97). Brill Sense.
  22. Murray, A. (2010). Empowering Teachers Through Professional Development. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 2-11). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.
  23. O’Dwyer, J. B., & Atlı, H. H. (2015). A Study of In-Service Teacher Educator Roles, With Implications for a Curriculum for Their Professional Development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 4-20.
  24. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). The Lost Promise of Teacher Professional Development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 3-24.
  25. Parel, C. P., Caldito, G. C., & Ferrer, P. L. (1973). Sampling Design and Procedures. New York, Singapore: The Agricultural Development Council Inc.
  26. Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., Cabell, S. Q., Wiggins, A. K., Turnbull, K. P., & Curenton, S. M. (2012). Impact of Professional Development on Preschool Teachers’ Conversational Responsivity and Children's Linguistic Productivity and Complexity. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 387-400.
  27. Prediger, S., Roesken-Winter, B., & Leuders, T. (2019). Which Research Can Support PD Facilitators? Strategies for Content-Related PD Research in the Three-Tetrahedron Model. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(4), 407-425.
  28. Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
  29. Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2007). Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 7(7), 205-244.
  30. Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2019). I Know I Can, but Do I Have the Time? The Role of Teachers' Self-Efficacy and Perceived Time Constraints in Implementing Cognitive-Activation Strategies in Science. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1697-1697.
  31. Timmermans, A. C., de Boer, H., & van der Werf, M. P. (2016). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Teachers’ Expectations and Teachers’ Perceptions of Student Attributes. Social Psychology of Education, 19(2), 217-240.
  32. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher Professional Development: An International Review of the Literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
  33. Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262.