Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of the Fix-Up Strategy in improving reading comprehension among eighth-grade EFL learners. Reading comprehension remains a persistent challenge for many students due to limited vocabulary, difficulties in understanding sentence structures, and inadequate strategic awareness during reading. While previous studies have reported the effectiveness of the Fix-Up Strategy, limited attention has been given to its structured implementation among Indonesian junior high school EFL learners. Therefore, this study examined the effectiveness of a systematic five-step Fix-Up Strategy in enhancing students’ reading comprehension achievement. This study employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design involving 54 eighth-grade students from a public junior high school in Indonesia, divided equally into experimental and control groups. Data were collected through reading comprehension tests and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics through SPSS. The findings revealed a substantial improvement in the experimental group, with the mean score increasing from 45.07 to 74.85, while the control group showed only a modest increase from 39.41 to 45.48. The Mann–Whitney U test further confirmed a statistically significant difference between groups (p = .000). These findings indicate that the structured Fix-Up Strategy effectively enhances students’ reading comprehension and offers practical pedagogical guidance for EFL teachers in promoting more active and metacognitive reading practices in junior high school classrooms.

Keywords

EFL learners Fix-Up Strategy Metacognitive Strategy Quasi-Experimental Study Reading Comprehension

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Chanda, A., Marhum, M., Patmasari, A., & Anggreni, A. (2026). Examining the Effectiveness of the Fix-Up Strategy in Enhancing Junior High School Students’ Reading Comprehension. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i3.455
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
  2. Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235
  3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage.
  4. Asnidah, S., Paturusi, M. A., & Burhanuddin, W. (2024). The implementation of fix-up strategy to students’ reading comprehension skill. English Language Teaching Methodology (ELTM), 4(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i1.271
  5. Awaluddin, M., Kamaruddin, A., Wahyudin, & Dewi, A. K. (2025). The use of fix-up strategy to improve reading comprehension of the eleventh-grade students of senior high school. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(1), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.5309
  6. Azwar, T. A., Ristiyanti, S. H., & Puspita, H. (2024). Enhancing Indonesian EFL students’ reading comprehension of report texts through KWL strategy with multimedia: A classroom action research. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 5(2), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.37905/jetl.v5i2.26015
  7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
  9. Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
  10. Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
  11. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  12. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  13. Herwanis, D., Zakaria, R., Renaldi, A., & Sari, I. (2021). The comparison between SQ5R and fix-up strategy in reading comprehension for EFL secondary level learners. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i3.3845
  14. Ibrahim, N., & Budiyanti, K. (2025). Teaching reading using fix-up strategy in reading comprehension. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 5(4), 297–304.
  15. Li, H., Gan, Z., Leung, S. O., & An, Z. (2022). The impact of reading strategy instruction on reading comprehension, strategy use, motivation, and self-efficacy in Chinese university EFL students. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221086659
  16. Misa, M. (2014). The use of guided metacognitive strategy to improve students’ reading comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 2(4), 304–310.
  17. Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
  18. Muhassin, M., Annisa, J., & Hidayati, D. A. (2021). The impact of fix-up strategy on Indonesian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14215a
  19. Ness, M. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content-area classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 229–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900314
  20. Pohan, D. H., Huda, R., Siagian, A. R., Khairunnisah, Parapat, L. H., Sari, I. W., Hajar, H. B., & Duerawee, A. (2025). The effect of using fix-up strategy in reading report text at the grade XI of SMA Negeri 1 Sibabangun. Jurnal Alfa: Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Bahasa, 3(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.64733/journalalfa.v3i2.118
  21. Ramadhona, R., Manurung, J. E., & Sari, F. (2022). Promoting fix-up strategy to improve reading comprehension at SMP Binatama Palembang. Didascein: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.52333/d.v3i1.923
  22. Sholeh, A., Setyosari, P., Cahyono, B. Y., & Sulthoni. (2019). Effects of scaffolded voluntary reading on EFL students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12419a
  23. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.
  24. Solekah, R. N., & Aziz, I. N. (2024). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy on students’ reading comprehension of narrative text. JEET: Journal of English Education and Technology, 5(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.59689/jeet.v5i01.39
  25. Suharni, S., Sesmiyanti, S., Perpisa, L., & Putri, A. (2024). Metacognitive reading strategies of EFL university students. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(4), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i4.538
  26. Teng, F. (2019). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181
  27. Ulfah, T., & Jannah, R. (2022). Research on the second-grade students’ reading comprehension ability through fix-up options strategy implementation. English Education Journal, 13(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i2.25581
  28. Widawati Tedjo, E., Teopilus, S., Hartani, T., & Sulindra, E. (2022). Metacognitive reading strategy awareness and reading performance of vocational lecturers. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i1.5247
  29. Yuliana, & Sutramakdalena, K. (2023). The effectiveness of using fix-up strategy to improve students’ reading comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(3), 527–540.
  30. Zagoto, I. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading (CSR) for better reading comprehension. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni, 17(1), 66–74.
  31. Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 396(12), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2013.12.010
  32. Zulfikar, M., Roza, V., Reflinda, & Melani, M. (2026). Examining the effect of using fix-up strategy on students’ reading comprehension. Edu Research: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pendidikan, 6(4), 3323–3331.