Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 143 Download : 126

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the critical role of mistakes and feedback in the learning process, focusing on the management of student performance in oral and written assessments. Mistakes are considered an inherent part of learning, so this study discusses strategies to effectively assess student performance, provide timely feedback, and create an environment that encourages continuous improvement. The first part of this study highlights that mistakes can be valuable learning opportunities. The study delves into the details of providing feedback in oral tasks, including how to deliver constructive feedback, encourage student reflection, identify areas for improvement, and motivate active participation in the learning process. The next section of the study addresses another crucial aspect of feedback, focusing on written assessments. It emphasizes effective methods to provide feedback to help students refine their writing skills. Additionally, it discusses how feedback can foster a growth mindset, increase resilience, and create a positive learning environment. The conclusion of this study advocates a holistic approach to learning, recognizing the role of mistakes while emphasizing the transformative impact of constructive feedback. By addressing both oral and written components, this study offers insights into effectively managing learning and creating an educational environment that supports continuous growth and improvement.

Keywords

Managing Learning Mistakes Feedback Oral Work Written Work

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Wisran, W., Furwana, D., Zainuddin, A. H. A., & Tanjung, F. (2025). Managing Learning: Mistakes Feedback Oral and Written Work. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v6i1.299
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ahmad, N. (2011). The Nature of Difficulties in Learning English by the students at Secondary School level in Pakistan. Of Education and Practice (JEP), 2(10), 18–24.
  2. Akhzhibek, B., & Kudaibergenova, M. R. (2023). Ways of Dealing with Pronunciation Errors of EFL Learners in School. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Research, 3630(April), 29–32.
  3. Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., Yitmen, I., & Homod, R. Z. (2023). Enhancing Student Engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s Power in Hybrid Education—A Review Analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070632
  4. Alqahtani, A. A. (2011). EFL Teachers’ Feedback to Oral Errors in EFL Classroom: Teachers’ Perspectives Abdulmuhsen. Arab World English Journal, 2(1), 214–232.
  5. Bergmann, B. A., Rubin, A. R., & Campbell, C. R. (1997). Potential of Paulownia Elongata Trees for Swine Waste Utilization. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 40(6), 1733–1738. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.21401
  6. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  7. Edge, K. A., & Darling, J. (1989). The Pumping Dynamics of Swash Plate Piston Pumps. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 111(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3153051
  8. Eskelinen, M. (2016). Written Essay Feedback Given by a Teacher and As Experienced by Students (Issue September). University of Jyväskylä.
  9. Fathia Baresh, E. (2022). Developing Libyan Undergraduates’ Writing Skills Through Reflective Journaling: a Critical Literature Review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1835
  10. Getie, A. S. (2020). Factors Affecting the Attitudes of Students Towards Learning English as a Foreign Language. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1738184
  11. Ha, X. Van, Nguyen, L. T., & Hung, B. P. (2021). Oral Corrective Feedback in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms: A Teaching and Learning Perspective. Heliyon, 7(7), e07550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07550
  12. Han, Y. (2019). Written Corrective Feedback from an Ecological Perspective: The Interaction between the Context and Individual Learners. System, 80, 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.009
  13. Harmer, J. (2015). The Pratice of English Language Teaching Fifth Edition. ELT Journal, 5(1), 1. https://www.scribd.com/embeds/490938777/content?start_page=1&view_mode=sgulung&access_key=key-fFexxf7MbzEfWu3HKwf
  14. Hassan, N. A. A. Al. (2019). Saudi EFL University Instructors’ Barriers to Teaching the Speaking Skills: Causes and Solutions. Arab World English Journal, 222, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.222
  15. Ihensekien, O. A., & Joel, A. C. (2023). Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor Motivation Theories: Implications for Organizational Performance. The Romanian Economic Journal, 85. https://doi.org/10.24818/rej/2023/85/04
  16. Johnson, K. (1988). Mistake Correction. ELT Journal, 42(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.2.89
  17. Juraj, J. (2024). Error Analysis of English Word Order in Written Assignments by EFL BA and Secondary School Students Language as a Foreign Language , MA Programme BA and secondary school students Supervisor : Tanja Gradečak , Associate Professor. J.J. Strossmayer University in Osijek Faculty.
  18. Khanahmadi, A. (2024). ESP Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback on Medical Students’ Reading Comprehension. International Arab Journal of English for Specific Purposes (IAJESP), 7(1), 27–43.
  19. Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-Five Years of Research on Oral and Written Corrective Feedback in System. System, 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
  20. Mack, L. (2009). Issues and Dilemmas: What Conditions are Necessary for Effective Teacher Written Feedback for ESL Learners ? Polyglossia, 16, 33–39. http://r-cube.ritsumei.ac.jp/repo/repository/rcube/680/4-polyglossia16_Issues and Dilemmas .pdf
  21. Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating Written Corrective Feedback: (Mis) Alignment of Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45(November 2018), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
  22. Menyani, N., & Merabti, M. (2024). An Investigation of the Impact of Teachers’ Corrective Feedback on Students’ Spoken Errors: The Case of Moroccan High School Teachers. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 5(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v5i2.427
  23. Pasaribu, A. N. (2021). A Common Error Analysis in Students’ English Narrative Writing. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(2), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i2.2338
  24. Peterson, S. S., & McClay, J. (2010). Assessing and Providing Feedback for Student Writing in Canadian Classrooms. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.003
  25. Purwandari, J. D. (2023). EFL Students’ Emotional Responses to Oral Feedback: The Case of Indonesia. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 11(1), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v11i1.17794
  26. Ratnaningsih, S., & Azizah, A. (2019). Error Analysis in the Descriptive Text Writing of Vocational High School Students. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1364
  27. Reynolds, B. L., & Kao, C. W. (2021). The Effects of Digital Game-Based Instruction, Teacher Instruction, and Direct Focused Written Corrective Feedback on the Grammatical Accuracy of English Articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747
  28. Saeed Al-Sobhi, B. M. (2019). The Nitty-gritty of Language Learners’ Errors – Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis and Interlanguage. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.3p.49
  29. Saine, K., & Santoso, S. B. (2024). The Impact of Teacher Competencies, Academic Supervision, and Principal Leadership on Teacher Performance in the Gambia’s Government High Schools. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 15(Iconomics 2023), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v15i.934
  30. Sari, Y. A., Septiyana, L., Suhono, S., Anggaira, A. S., & Hasyim, U. A. F. A. (2021). Corrective Feedback in Learning Interaction: Integration of Surface Strategy Taxonomy. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 2266–2280. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.847
  31. Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020524
  32. Silver & Lee, S. (2007). What Does It Take to Make a Change? Teacher Feedback and Student Revisions RITA SILVER. Distribution, 6(1), 25–49.
  33. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 333–339.
  34. Solhi, M., & Eǧinli, I. (2020). The Effect of Recorded Oral Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.712628
  35. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, First Language Influence, and Developmental Readiness in Second Language Acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00002
  36. Supiani, Yansyah, & Basthomi, Y. (2023). Indonesian University Students’ Engagement with Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback in English as an Additional Language Writing Classroom. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121334
  37. Tarigan, K. E., Stevani, M., Ginting, F. Y. A., Prayuda, M. S., Sari, D. W., & Lumbanraja, B. (2023). Oral Corrective Feedback and Error Analysis: Indonesian Teachers‟ Beliefs to Improve Speaking Skill. World Journal of English Language, 13(6), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n6p140
  38. Toba, R., Noor, W. N., & Sanu, L. O. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Comparsion and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57–73.
  39. Tricia Hedge. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press.
  40. van der Kleij, F. M. (2020). Evaluation of the ‘Feedback Engagement Enhancement Tool’ to examine and enhance students’ engagement with feedback on their writing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(July), 100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100907
  41. Wihastyanang, W. D., Kusumaningrum, S. R., Latief, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Impacts of Providing Online Teacher and Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.728157
  42. Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and Writing: Review of Research. Computers and Education, 128, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024
  43. Yusuf, Y. Q., Mustafa, F., & Iqbal, R. M. (2021). An Inquiry into Grammatical Errors in Writing Committed by High Achieving EFL Students. International Journal of Language Studies, 15(2), 1–22.
  44. Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021). EFL Students’ Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12(April), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564