Main Article Content
Abstract
There were several student problems that the writer found at SMAN 2 Tilatang Kamang. First, Some students agree on using humor in the classroom, but some students disagree on using humor in the classroom. Second, Some students said that using humor in teaching English is necessary to make the atmosphere pleasant. Using humor in teaching helped them to understand the material quickly and made them enjoy the learning. Last, Some students said that the use of humor in learning English is good as long as they don't laugh too much in class because it will take up a lot of time in the learning process and cause the learning process to be not optimal. So, some students do not understand the material. This research aims to determine students' perceptions of using humor in teaching English classes. The researcher wants to determine whether students' perceptions are positive or negative. The instrument of this research used a quantitative approach with a descriptive form. The population was the Eleventh Grade at SMAN 2 Tilatang Kamang in 2020/2021, with 75 students. The researcher used the total sampling technique because the population was less than 100 students. The result of this research was taken by taking the average score of 6 types of humor in learning English, namely learning Caricature Humor (78,07%), Short Stories/Anecdotes Humor (78,53%), Special Humor (74,13%), and Unplanned Humor, Performance, Pantomime, and Gestures (73,12%). It was found that male and female students have positive perceptions of humor in teaching English. Female students had slightly better perceptions than male students (75,74%>73,81%). Thus, the result of the research showed that students supported the use of humor in teaching English class.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
- Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy: Second Edition, New York : Addison Wesley Longman , Inc, P. 165
- Cooper, K. M. (2018). To be funny or not to be funny: Gender Differences in Student Perceptions of Instructor Humor in College Science Courses. USA: Arizona State University
- Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. United States of America: Merril Prentice, Hall. p.213
- Darmasyah. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Menyenangkan dengan Humor. Jakarta: BumiAksara. p. 3
- Fata, I. A. (2018). Laugh and Learning: Evaluating from Students' Perspective of Humor Used in English Class : Al-Ta'lim Journal, Vol. 25. No. 2. p. 118
- Margono. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Komponen MKDK. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. p.105-106
- Morrison, M. K. (2008). Using Humor to Maximize Learning, Rowman & Lttlefield Education. Lanham, Marland Toronto Plymouth, p. 4
- Muir, F. (2002). The Oxford Book of humorous prose. Oxford University Press. p. 5
- Sudijono, A. (2014). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo, p. 43
- Sugiyono. (2014). Metodologi Pendidikan Bisnis, Bandung: Alfabeta. p. 200
- Sugiyono. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. PT. Gramedia, Jakarta
- Sukardi. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara. p.157
- Suryani and Hendriyadi. (2015). MetodeRisetKuantitatif. Jakarta: Kencana. p. 203