Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Low reading interest and comprehension difficulties among EFL junior high school students, particularly in understanding narrative texts, remain significant challenges in Indonesian education, especially in rural settings. This mixed-methods research investigated the reading strategies used by third-grade junior high school students in comprehending narrative texts and how they use those strategies in reading class. A qualitative case study design was employed, supported by quantitative data from a questionnaire. The subjects were 27 third-grade students at a junior high school in Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi. Data were collected through classroom observations using field notes and a questionnaire based on (Banditvilai, 2020) framework of four reading strategies: skimming, scanning, making predictions, and questioning. Thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data, while descriptive statistics (percentages) were calculated for quantitative data. The findings revealed that students employed all four strategies with distinct patterns. Skimming and scanning functioned as efficiency-oriented strategies: 74.1% of students sometimes skipped small details during reading. Prediction and questioning functioned as depth-oriented strategies: 55.6% often compared predictions with actual information. The integration of questionnaire and observation data through methodological triangulation indicates that students actively combine multiple metacognitive strategies. However, the gap between "Sometimes" and "Often" responses suggests that consistent application remains a challenge requiring explicit instructional support.

Keywords

Junior High School Narrative Text Questioning Reading Strategies Skimming

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Fitri, Bimas Reskiawan, Susi Astiantih, & Roslina. (2026). Reading Strategies in Narrative Text Comprehension: A Case Study of Indonesian EFL Junior High School Students. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 647-662. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i2.421
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2015). Reading comprehension strategy instruction. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 381–394). Routledge.
  2. Al-jarrah, H., Salina, N., & Ismail, B. (2018). Reading Comprehension Difficulties Among EFL Learners in Higher Learning Institutions. 8(7), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n7p32
  3. Amalia, A. R., & Devanti, Y. M. (2017). The Use of Questioning Strategy to Improve Students ’ Reading Comprehension. 81–88.
  4. Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99–109). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Banditvilai, C. (2020). The Effectiveness of Reading Strategies on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.v10.1012
  6. Block, E. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587008
  7. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Resesarch Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  9. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.
  10. Farihah, E. N., Chotimah, C., Tamela, E., & As-syafiiyah, U. I. (2023). An Analysis of Students ’ Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text. 8(2), 48–55.
  11. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  13. Hidayat, T., & Maharot, |. (2017). the Effect of Narrative Text on Student’S English Reading Comprehension. MAHAROT: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 2580–3999.
  14. Huyen, T. T. N., & Anh, K. H. (2022). Investigating Factors Affecting Reading Comprehension, Perceptions of Reading Task-Types and Strategies. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v6i1.4178
  15. Hyland, K. (2013). Teaching and Researching Reading Applied Linguistics in Action. Routledge.
  16. Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading Comprehension: Core Components and Processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707
  17. Marzona, Y., & Ikhsan, M. (2019). An Analysis of Students’ Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text at Second Grade At SMAN 1 Talamau. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 3(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v3i1.349
  18. Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies , Motivation , and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. 9(3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
  19. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
  20. Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
  21. Nurrisa, F., & Hermina, D. (2025). Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian: Strategi, Tahapan, dan Analisis Data. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JTTP), 2(3), 793–800.
  22. Okasha, M. A. (2020). Using Strategic Reading Techniques for Improving EFL Reading Skills Mohammed Ahmed Okasha English Language Institute, Jazan University Jazan, Saudi Arabia. 11(June), 311–322.
  23. Özdemir, S. (2018). The effect of summarization strategies teaching on strategy usage and narrative text summarization success. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2199–2209. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061018
  24. Pardede, P. (2022). Online Reading Strategies in EFL : A Review. 8(2), 329–339.
  25. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  26. Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
  27. Prastika, R. M., Ismiyati, Y., & Munawwaroh, K. (2020). The Effect of Prediction Strategy toward Students ’ Reading Comprehension for the Tenth Grade Students at SMAN 8 Muaro Jambi Based on Researcher ’ s observation in SMAN 8 Muaro Jambi in 2017 , Researcher found that the students were less of understanding . 4(2).
  28. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Routledge.
  29. Putri, A. S., Nugraha, S. I., & Ridwan, I. (2024). EFL Students ’ Engagement in Reading Classroom by Using. 7(2), 82–91.
  30. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND.
  31. Sutarti, T. (2017). Efforts to Increase Students Reading Interest on Educational Reference Through Classical Guidance and Counseling Experiential Learning Model. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 2(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v2i1.152