Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates the impact of TikTok on junior high school students' English learning motivation and identifies effective content types. Using a descriptive qualitative approach with supporting quantitative data, this study involved 7 students from SMPN 2 Pandan Nauli who regularly engaged with English learning content on TikTok. Data was collected through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and content observation. The findings show that students feel more motivated to learn English through TikTok content, especially vocabulary tips, idiomatic expressions, and pronunciation, which are presented in an interesting, easy-to-understand, and contextually appropriate way. While TikTok cannot replace formal education, its effectiveness as a complementary learning tool depends on the quality of the content and students' ability to integrate it into their learning routines. This study recommends that educators utilize digital platforms like TikTok to foster a more engaging, flexible and meaningful English learning experience for today's generation.

Keywords

Digital Media Edutainment Informal Learning Language Learning Motivation Student Engagement

Article Details

How to Cite
Sitompul, E. D., & Yunita, D. (2025). Exploring the Role of TikTok in Enhancing English Learning Motivation among Indonesian Students. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(3), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v6i3.259

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Annapis, M. A. (2024). The effectiveness of TikTok videos in improving EFL students’ speaking confidence and vocabulary mastery. International Journal of Educational Research \& Innovation, 27(1), 87–102.
  3. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
  4. Bandura, A. (2020). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.
  5. Beatty, B. J. (2020). Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2020/6/hybrid-flexible-course-design
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
  7. Cesarini, A. N., Sulaeman, N., Mulyana, S. S., & Yolandri, V. (2021). Utilizing Duolingo in learning vocabulary. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education of Suryakancana, 109–117.
  8. Chen, B., & Jang, S. J. (2019). Motivation in online language learning environments based on Self-Determination Theory. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.439
  9. Chima Abimbola Eden, Onyebuchi Nneamaka Chisom, & Idowu Sulaimon Adeniyi. (2024). Harnessing technology integration in education: Strategies for enhancing learning outcomes and equity. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(2), 001–008. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.2.0071
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
  11. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics \& Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 149. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
  12. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Keller, J. M. (2017). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49880-6
  14. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revisited]. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (pp. 217–235). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108585709.014
  15. Li, L., Huang, J., & Gao, Y. (2023). TikTok-assisted oral English learning in MICE education: A comparative study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00391-0
  16. Low, S. (2019). Qualitative research methods: A practical guide. Sage.
  17. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  18. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education, 128(September 2018), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  19. Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Naab, T. K. (2019). The process of forming a mobile media habit: results of a longitudinal study in a real-world setting. Media Psychology, 22(5), 714–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1513850
  20. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z Goes to College. Jossey-Bass.
  21. Sensor Tower. (2022). TikTok Surpasses 1 Billion Monthly Active Users.
  22. Setyowati, L. (2021). Utilization of Seamless Learning as a Learning Model during Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i2.3401
  23. Vogl, S., Schmidt, E. M., & Zartler, U. (2019). Triangulating perspectives: ontology and epistemology in the analysis of qualitative multiple perspective interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1630901
  24. Wahyuni, P., Yusdita, E. E., & Harumiati, Y. (2024). The Impact of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model on Student Learning Outcomes in Learning Banking Basics. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 4(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v4i2.125
  25. Zein, M., Weny, K., & Br. Perangin-angin, A. (2024). Edutainment of Using Tiktok in Learning English Vocabulary a Case Study of Secondary Student. Majalah Ilmiah METHODA, 14(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.46880/methoda.vol14no3.pp288-295