Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 311 Download : 145

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the perception of teachers about the use of Hume AI for assessing students’ speaking skills in senior high school. English teachers (n=4) from public senior high schools in North Sumatra participated in this study. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method with semi-structured interviews and field note observations. The data was examined by using thematic analysis. The result indicated that Hume AI has a positive impact on students’ enthusiasm and interest. However, several challenges hinder the optimal use of Hume AI in speaking assessments, particularly in spontaneous speaking, including their low motivation to learn English due to socio-economic factors, and insufficient access to technological infrastructure within schools. Despite these obstacles, teachers acknowledged the potential of Hume AI to enhance speaking assessment and recommended its integration as both a learning and assessment tool. These findings offer insightful information for teachers, policymakers, and AI developers looking to implement AI-based tools in language learning and assessment practices.

Keywords

Hume AI Learning Media Speaking Assessment Teachers’ Perceptions

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Nasution, N. F., & Armin, D. S. (2025). The Use of Hume AI in Speaking Assessments: Teachers’ Perceptions in Senior High School Contexts. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(3), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v6i3.256
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Alsalem, M. S. (2024). EFL teachers’ perceptions of the use of an AI grading tool (CoGrader) in English writing assessment at Saudi universities: an Activity Theory Perspective. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2430865
  2. Anggreini, S., Musiman, M., & Pratiwi, D. S. (2023). Teachers’ and Students’ Perception on the Use of Cake Application toward Their Speaking Skill On Merdeka Belajar Era. ELT-Lectura, 10(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v10i2.15159
  3. Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic Assessment of Advanced Second Language Learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576–598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x
  4. Aprianoto, & Haerazi. (2019). Development and assessment of an interculture-based instrument model in the teaching of speaking skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 2796–2805. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071230
  5. Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135
  6. Berry, D. M., & Dieter, M. (2015). Thinking postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design. Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_1
  7. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (Fifth Edit). Pearson Longman.
  8. Budiharto, R. A., & Affandi, A. (2018). The Roles of Teacher in Teaching English Based on School Based Curriculum at the VII A Grade of SMPN I Kadur Pamekasan. Interaksi Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 44–52.
  9. Crick, R. D., & Yu, G. (2008). Assessing learning dispositions: Is the Effective lifelong learning inventory valid and reliable as a measurement tool? Educational Research, 50(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802499886
  10. Dwijuliani, R., Rijanto, T., Munoto, Nurlaela, L., Basuki, I., & Maspiyah. (2021). Increasing student achievement motivation during online learning activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1810/1/012072
  11. Fitria, T. N. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (Ai) in Education: Using Ai Tools for Teaching and Learning Process. IJIREEICE, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.17148/ijireeice.2025.13206
  12. Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M., & Zühlke, D. (2014). Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. Proceedings - 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, INDIN 2014, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2014.6945523
  13. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers : Maximazing Impact on Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522-6
  14. Helmiatin, Hidayat, A., & Kahar, M. R. (2024). Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: a study of public universities in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2380175
  15. Hung, S. T.-A., & Huang, H.-T. D. (2015). Blogs as a learning and assessment instrument for English-speaking performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1881–1894. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057746
  16. Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: a comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4
  17. Kim, J. (2021). A New Era of Education: Incorporating Machine Teachers Into Education. Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 4, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.31446/jcp.2018.02
  18. Kustyarini, K., Utami, S., & Koesmijati, E. (2020). The Importance of Interactive Learning Media in a New Civilization Era. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 5(2), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3298
  19. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
  20. Mundy, K., Bickmore, K., Hayhoe, R., Madden, M., & Madjidi, K. (2008). Comparative and International Education : Issues for Teachers. Canadian Scholars.
  21. Mutia, L., Gimin, G., & Mahdum, M. (2020). Development of Blog-Based Audio Visual Learning Media to Improve Student Learning Interests in Money and Banking Topic. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 436. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.2.p.436-448
  22. Naibaho, L. (2019). Teachers’ Roles on English Language Teaching: a Students Centered Learning Approach. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 7(4), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i4.2019.892
  23. Navidinia, H., Mobaraki, M., & Malekzadeh, F. (2019). Investigating the effect of noticing on EFL students’ speaking accuracy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1216a
  24. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (Thrid Edit). Sage Publications.
  25. Poudel, N. R. (2022). Different Roles of Teachers in the ELT Classroom. Journal of NELTA Karnali, 1(November), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.3126/jonk.v1i1.57224
  26. Rahmawati, Y., & Ertin. (2014). Developing Assessment for Speaking. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 1(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v1i2.1345
  27. Safdari, M., & Fathi, J. (2020). Investigating the role of dynamic assessment on speaking accuracy and fluency of pre-intermediate EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1818924
  28. Stenbom, S., & Geijer, L. (2025). Primary school teachers’ perception of digital transformation and their teaching role. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2394395
  29. Tang, K. S., Cooper, G., Rappa, N., Cooper, M., Sims, C., & Nonis, K. (2024). A dialogic approach to transform teaching, learning & assessment with generative AI in secondary education: a proof of concept. Pedagogies : An International Journal, 19(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2024.2379774
  30. Vasagar, J. (2017). How robots are teaching Singapore’s kids. Financial Times, 1–7. https://www.ft.com/content/f3cbfada-668e-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614
  31. Vercellotti, M. Lou. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv002
  32. Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. Routledge.
  33. Widodo, A. W., Solikhatun, I., Raharja, S., Salam, A. A., & Wartini, S. F. (2021). A Utilization of Information Technology on Education in Indonesia (2017-2020): A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1779(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012024
  34. Zaim, M. (2017). Implementing Scientific Approach to Teach English at Senior High School in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n2p33
  35. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  36. Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2019). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668