Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the activities of MEP and their impact on improving students' speaking skills. This study applied a descriptive quantitative method. In collecting the data, the researchers of the administered questionnaire were divided into two groups: an English teacher at SMK Bhakti Mulia Pare and 11th-grade students who became members of the MEP. Then, the researcher interviewed five students and one teacher to expand the information received. Data analysis was done by calculating the percentage of students' participation in each activity. The supporting qualitative data was analyzed by collecting, displaying, and drawing conclusions. The reliability of the study data was checked through data triangulation. The results of this study showed that the MEP activities consisted of speeches, reading aloud, telling stories and group discussions. Following the implementation of these activities, students' speaking skills, which include grammatical accuracy, pronunciation skills, vocabulary mastery, fluidity, and the ability to organize concepts in speaking, improve. In addition, students experience low anxiety and are more interested in learning English. This positive impact results from the teacher's role in preparing appropriate teaching methods and creating a positive learning environment. Henceforth, this study emphasizes the importance of planning before implementing an English program and adopting similar activities to improve students' speaking skills.

Keywords

Community Language Learning Extracurricular Activities Morning English Program Speaking Skills

Article Details

How to Cite
Anshori, M. I., Shofiya, A., & Iftanti, E. (2023). Morning English Program (MEP) as a Strategy to Improve Students’ Speaking Skills at SMK Bhakti Mulia Pare Kediri. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(3), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v4i3.135

References

  1. Arum, D. I. C. (2018). English Club for Students of Non-English Department. Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017). Surabaya, Indonesia: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.13.
  2. As, A. B. (2016). Storytelling to Improve Speaking Skills. English Education Journal, 7(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v10i1.879
  3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Barnlund, D. C. (1970). A Transactional Model of Communication. In Foundations of Communication Theory (pp. 83-94). New York: Harper & Row.
  5. Bouzar, Siham. (2019). Issues in Teaching Speaking to EFL Learners. Education and Linguistics Research. 5. 70. 10.5296/elr.v5i1.14705.
  6. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
  7. Curran, C. (1976). Counseling-Learning: A Whole-Person Model for Education. Prentice-Hall.
  8. Hymes, D. (1971). Competence and Performance in Linguistic Theory. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.), Language Acquisition: Models and Methods (pp. 3-28). New York: Academic Press.
  9. Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books.
  10. Jannah, M., Usman, B., & Marhaban, S. (2020). Students' Perspectives and Challenges in English Speech Program. English Education Journal, 11(4), 529–542.
  11. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
  12. Mei, L. L., & Masoumeh, A. (2017). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Learners' English Speaking Skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 2(1), 34–41.
  13. Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. Prentice-Hall.
  14. Pereira, A. H., Ismail, K., & Othman, Z. (2013). A Model for the Malaysian English Language Club Activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90(InCULT 2012), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.064
  15. Richards, Jack C. 2008. Teaching Listening &Speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Saepuloh, A. (2017). The Implementation of Community Language Learning (CLL) in Teaching Speaking (A Qualitative Study at One of Universities in Cianjur). Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 5(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v5i1.191
  17. Supraba, A., Wahyono, E., & Syukur, A. (2020). The Implementation of Reading Aloud in Developing Students' Speaking Skill. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1319
  18. Surahman, D., & Sofyan, A. (2021). The Effect of Community Language Learning and Emotional Intelligence on Students' Speaking Skill. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 24(1), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2021v24n1i8.
  19. Terrell, T. D., & Brown, H. D. (1981). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Language, 57(3), 781-790. https://doi.org/10.2307/414380
  20. Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. London: Pearson Longman. Vin-Mbah, F. I. (2012). Learning and Teaching Methodology. Doukas School, Greece & SoFIA Education Experts, U.K.: IGI Global Publisher. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3053- 4.ch007
  21. Wulandari, S., Sada, C., & Arifin, Z. (2016). The Effectiveness of DST to Develop Speaking skills for English Club Students. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 5(3), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v5i3.14162
  22. Yorio, C. A. (1978). The Community Language Learning Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 447-458.
  23. Yuliandasari, A., & Kusriandi, W. (2018). Students' Perception on English Club Extracurricular in Speaking Practices at Madrasah. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 3(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v3i2.1670
  24. Zulhermindra. (2018). Promoting English Club as an Extracurricular Activity for Young Learners: Suggested Procedure. 3rd International Conference on Education 2018 - Teachers in the Digital Age, 2001, 389–400. London: Francis Press.