Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to investigate the use of WhatsApp messenger to develop students’ writing skills, and to find out the benefits and challenges of the use of WhatsApp messenger to develop students’ writing skills. The design of this study was classroom action research. The researcher used observation, interview, and test to collect the data. In analyzing the data, the researcher followed the procedure of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The study reports that there was an improvement of the students’ recount text writing skill through scientific approach. In cycle I, the percentage of scores covers steps of rhetorical was (67.50%), grammar (71.25%), vocabulary (66.25%), clarity of meaning (67.50%), and relation between ideas (63.75%). In cycle II, the percentage of scores covers steps of rhetorical was (78.75%), grammar (78.75%), vocabulary (76.25%), clarity of meaning (87.50%), and relation between ideas (81.25%). This study also reports some benefits of using WhatsApp messenger were; the students used their creativity in teaching and learning activity, were interested in teaching and learning processes, and conveyed their assumptions in associating and networking freely. In contrast, it also had challenges in teaching and learning processes. The challenges were; most of students were not enthusiastic to follow teaching and learning of WhatsApp messenger. They must be persuaded to ask questions in questioning phase and they must be directed to be disciplined in the classroom.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
- Arikunto, S. 2018. Prosedur Paenelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Artono Wardiman, et.al. 2008. English in Focus: for Grade VIII Junior High School (SMP/MTS). Jakarta:PusatPerbukuan, DEPDIKNAS.
- Brown, H. D. 2000. Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
- Dorothy E Zemach and Lisa A Rumisek. 2005. Academic Writing from Paragraph to Essay. Oxford:Macmillan.
- Elizabeth, M. E. S. and Rao, D. B. 2014. Acquisition of English Vocabulary. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.
- Ellis, R. & Barkhuzein,G. 2003. Analyzing Learner Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Ellis, R. 1996. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- George E. Wishon and James M. Burk. 1980. Let’s Write English. New York: American Book Company.
- Gerot L, and Wignell P. 1995. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
- Goldman, B. 1978. Reading and Writing in the Arts. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
- Hornby, A. S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kemis, S. and Tagart, 1998. The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University.
- Nunan, D. 1992. Syllabus Design: Language Teaching: ASA Scheme for Teacher Education. London: Oxford University Press.
- Spratt, M., Pulverness, A. and Willimas, M. 2005. The TKT; Teaching Knowledge Test Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Sudarwati, M., and Eudian Grace. Look Ahead; An English Course for Senior High School Student Year 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.