Main Article Content


This thesis focused on the research questions is how the English Teacher performance in teaching, include: how the planning of the teacher before teaching, how the strategies of the teacher in teaching, and constraints that affect teacher performance in teaching at SMAN 3 Palopo. The data were collected through observation, interviews, and documents, and were analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The object of the research was the teacher of SMAN 3 Palopo, who has been certified. The research analyzed the data that has been found by observation, and the result was explained in the discussion. The results showed that the performance of English teachers in teaching at SMAN 3 Palopo was quite good. Saw from his readiness before teaching, the selection of strategies and methods that were suitable, as well as how to deal with all the obstacles that exist.


English Language Teaching Teacher Performance

Article Details

Author Biography

Nina Utami, State Islamic Institute of Palopo (IAIN Palopo), Indonesia




How to Cite
Utami, N. (2020). English Teacher Performance in Teaching at SMAN 3 Palopo. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 55-62.


  1. Alannasir, W. (2020). Characteristic-Based Development Students Aspect. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 29–36.
  2. Daphne D. Minner, Abigail Jurist Levy, Jeanne Century. 2009. Inquiry-Based Science Instruction—What Is It and Does It Matter?. The University of Chicago.
  3. David F. Lohman. 1997. Issues in The Definition and Measurement of Abilities, (The University of Iowa, USA)
  4. EP Ques Appendixes.1988. Model of Arbitrator Competence.
  5. Gandara.P, Maxwell-Jolly.J, Driscoll.A .2005. Listening to Teachers of English Language Learners. (The Regents of the University of California)
  6. Goldenberg, C. 2008. Teaching English Language Learners: What the Research Does - And Does Not – Say; Georgia Southern University.
  7. Goldhaber, DD. and Dominic J. Brewer. 1996. Evaluating the Effect of Teacher Degree Level on Educational Performance; Santa Monica.
  8. Madjid, Abd. 2016. Pengembangan Kinerja Guru Melalui: Kompetensi, Komitmen dan Motivasi Kerja, Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru.
  9. Ning Zahroh, Mas. Evaluasi Kinerja dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Yayasan Al Kenaniyah Jakarta Timur; Jakarta Timur.
  10. Philippe Dessus, Sonia Mandin, and Virginie Zampa.2008. What is Teaching? Cognitive-Based Tutoring Principles for the Design of a Learning Environment. (Common innovation in e-learning, machine learning and humanoid.
  11. Rain S. Bongolan. 2005. Six Key Strategies for Teachers of English-Language Learners; University of California at Santa Cruz.
  12. Spronken-Smith, R. 2006. Experiencing the Process of Knowledge Creation: The Nature and Use of Inquiry-Based Learning in Higher Education. University of Otago, New Zealand.
  13. Villegas- Reimers, E.2003. Teacher Professional Development: An International Review of the Literature. International Institute for Educational Planning.
  14. Villegas-Reimers, Eleonora. 1994. Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature.
  15. Yusrus Sana, Mohammad. 2006. Penilaian Kinerja Guru Mengenai Profesionalisme Guru di SMP NU Putri Kartika Kab.Kudus. Semarang.
  16. Zamel, V. 1982. Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning. (TESOL Quarterly is currently published by Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.)