Main Article Content
Abstract
Vocabulary is a key element of English language learning upon which it builds learners´ ability to communicate successfully and improve their overall levels of proficiency in the language. Gamification-based learning platforms have recently garnered a lot of attention in the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL), as they may potentially enhance student engagement and ultimately lead to better learning outcomes. Even though Quizizz is more widely used in language classrooms, there have been very few pieces of empirical evidence in the literature that state its effectiveness for improving vocabulary mastery among Indonesian junior high school students (in studies using an experimental design). The research sought to determine if Quizizz based gamification significantly enhances students' vocabulary mastery over conventional instructional approaches. In total, a quantitative quasi-experimental design with 62 ninth-grade students at the public junior high school in Indonesia (experimental group n = 32; control group n = 30) was conducted. Data were collected and analyzed using pre-test and post-test a 50-item vocabulary test, descriptive statistics, paired-sample t-tests, and effect size calculation. Results indicated a large gain for the experimental group (mean scores improved from 59.94 to 84.07) compared with the control group, whose means increased from 60.33 to 67.07 Statistical analysis showed significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores (p <. 001), which indicate that Quizizz is a good tool to improve the students' master of vocabulary. These findings elucidate the pedagogical potentials of gamified learning environments in vocabulary instruction and advocate the infusion of digital gamification instruments with a view to enhancing EFL learning experience for greater motivation, engagement and effectiveness.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
- Barclay, S., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Current Perspectives on Vocabulary Teaching and Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, Part F1628, 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_42
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Fakhruddin, Z., Dalle, A., & Tjalla, M. (2026). Memory Strategies in Vocabulary Learning: Journal of English Languange Teaching, 7(2), 372–384.
- Fan, Y. (2024). Review on the Application of Universal Design for Learning in Classroom Instruction. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education, 11(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2024.3.393
- Fithriani, R. (2026). Applying Universal Design for Learning in Teaching English Vocabulary in Inclusive Elementary Education : A Qualitative Study. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 502–521.
- Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work? — A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification Juho. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January (6–9), 3025–3034.
- Hartina, S., & Muin, F. R. (2026). Exploring Young Learners’ Vocabulary Needs through Visual and Interactive Materials : A TEYL Perspective. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 8(1), 48–63.
- Husnaini, H., Wahibah, W., & Irfani, D. Z. (2026). Developing an Interactive EFL Digital Vocabulary Book at MAN Palopo Using the 4D Model. Datokarama English Education Journal, 7(1), 81–100.
- Langi, N. T., Masruddin, Ermawati, & Husnaini. (2024). Using Picture of Luwu Culture Activity for Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching Methodology, 4(3), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i3.1608
- Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Huang, C. Y. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Quizizz for Enhancing English Vocabulary Acquisition and Engagement Among Rural Elementary Students. SAGE Open, 15(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251379697
- Luo, Z. (2023). The Effectiveness of Gamified Tools for Foreign Language Learning (FLL): A Systematic Review. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040331
- Ngọc, N. T. B., & Phương, T. T. N. (2022). The Application of Quizizz Games on Vocabulary Retention of Non-English Majors Students: A Case Study at Thai Nguyen University of Education. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 12(5), 37. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.12.05.2022.p12506
- Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
- Waluyo, B., & Tran, H. M. (2023). Implementing Gamified Vocabulary Learning in Asynchronous Mode. Teflin Journal, 34(1), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/136-156
- Yunus, M. M., Ang, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2021). Factors affecting teaching english as a second language (TESL) postgraduate students’ behavioural intention for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063524
- Zainuddin, Z. (2024). Integrating ease of use and affordable gamification-based instruction into a remote learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(5), 1261–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09832-6
- Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
- Zhang, R., Cheng, G., & Zou, D. (2025). Effects of digital game elements on engagement and vocabulary development. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73618
- Zhang, Z., & Crawford, J. (2024). EFL learners’ motivation in a gamified formative assessment: The case of Quizizz. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 6217–6239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12034-7