Main Article Content

Abstract

The globalization of science has reinforced English as the dominant language of scientific communication, requiring pre-service science teachers to acquire sufficient mastery of English scientific terminology for academic and professional success. However, many pre-service teachers in Indonesia face persistent challenges, including limited vocabulary, low confidence, and insufficient access to effective learning media. To address these issues, digital tools such as Disainary, a multimodal web-based dictionary designed for scientific terms, have been introduced as innovative learning resources. This study aims to explore pre-service science teachers’ perceptions and experiences of using Disainary in vocabulary learning. Employing a descriptive qualitative design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations with 30 participants across several universities in Indonesia. This used purposive sampling technique to employ the participants. The findings indicate three major themes: (1) vocabulary acquisition through repetition and multimodality, (2) increased motivation and engagement, and (3) challenges and limitations. Participants highlighted that Disainary facilitated repeated encounters with scientific terms through definitions, contextual examples, and pronunciation features, which enhanced comprehension and retention. Moreover, the tool’s accessibility and scientific contextualization motivated learners to engage with vocabulary more actively. Despite these benefits, participants emphasized the need for expanded lexical coverage, additional exercises, and the visual elements to optimize learning. The study concludes that Disainary holds strong potential as a digital learning tool to bridge the gap between English vocabulary acquisition and science literacy in teacher education. Implications suggest that integrating multimodal digital tools can not only enhance pre-service teachers’ language proficiency but also prepare them for effective knowledge transmission in globalized science classrooms.

Keywords

Digital Learning Tools Disainary Pre-service Science Teachers Scientific Vocabulary

Article Details

How to Cite
Rohmani, L. A. R., Awwalia , L., & Zahrotin , A. (2026). Pre-Service Teacher’s Perceptions of Disainary for Learning English Scientific Vocabulary: A Qualitative Study. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i1.331

References

  1. Aina, J. K., Ogundele, A. G., & Olanipekun, S. S. (2013). Students ’ Proficiency in English Language Relationship with Academic Performance in Science and Technical Education. 1(9), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-9-2
  2. Andayani, E. S. (2022). THE IMPORTANCE OF LEARNING AND KNOWING. Research and Development Journal of Education, 8(1), 372–379.
  3. Ariyanti, L., Rahmawati, A. N., Tinggi, S., & Kesehatan, I. (2023). LUNAR ( Language and Art ). 7(1), 18–32.
  4. Cohen, M. T. (2012). The Importance of Vocabulary for Science Learning. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(2), 72–77. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ993005
  5. Coxhead, A. (2018). Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research, Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  6. Duong, T. M., Tran, T. Q., Thanh, T., & Nguyen, P. (2021). Non-English Majored Students ’ Use of English Vocabulary Learning Strategies with Technology-Enhanced Language Learning Tools. 2009.
  7. Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 305–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015
  8. Giawa, Y., & Panjaitan, N. B. (2021). The Correlation Between Students’ Vocabulary Mastery and Reading Comprehension: A Meta Analysis. 7(April 2021), 45–60.
  9. Hansen, A. (2024). Multimodality and Vocabulary Acquisition: Teachers’ Practices and Perspectives [Oslo Metropolitan University]. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3162641
  10. Havwini, T., Sari, D. R., Fadilah, N., & Firdaus, F. (2024). English Vocabulary Mastery In Vocational Higher Education : An Analysis Of Challenges And Feasible Strategies. 06(04), 19110–19118.
  11. Hindrasti, N. E. K., & Amelia, T. (2018). Modul bahasa inggris untuk biologi berorientasi literasi sains untuk mahasiswa pendidikan biologi. 9(1), 13–23.
  12. Idayani, A., Satriani, E., & Akhra, I. D. (2025). Pengucapan Bahasa Inggris : Memanfaatkan Aplikasi English Pronunciation IPA untuk Membantu Mahasiswa Mengucapkan Kata dengan Benar English Pronunciation : Utilizing the English Pronunciation IPA Application to Help Students Pronounce the Words Properly. 16(1), 102–111.
  13. Janjić, P., Spencer, J. P., & Coventry, K. R. (2026). Second language vocabulary learning: The interplay between learning mode, testing mode and word class. Cognition, 270, 106381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106381
  14. Kay, R. (2011). Examining the Effectiveness of Web-Based Learning Tools in Middle and Secondary School Science Classrooms. 7.
  15. Lee, O., & Cory A. Buxton. (2013). Integrating Science And English Proficiency For English Language Learners. Theory Into Pratice, 52(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743772
  16. Maryna, A., & Yaroslav, K. (2024). THE FEATURES OF MASTERING FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY BY STUDENTS OF NON-LANGUAGE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. Youth & Market, 160–164.
  17. Moleong, L. J. (2019). Teknik Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berkomunikasi dalam Bahasa Inggris bagi Mahasiswa Non-Jurusan Bahasa Inggris. Scolae: Journal of Pedagogy, 2(184–192).
  18. Nation, P., & Richards, J. C. (2017). I jelt. 12(1).
  19. Oktaviani, N., & Faizah, U. N. (2024). Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal The Effect of Science Literacy Skills to Contextual Thinking Skills on Science Literacy-Based Learning. 5(1), 1–10.
  20. Othman, S. M. (2025). The Impact of Technology on English Language Learning Article Info Received : 08-04-2025 Accepted : 10-05-2025 Page No : 81-85. 81–85.
  21. Panagiotidis, P., & Arvanitis, P. (2023). Technology as a Motivational Factor in Foreign Language Learning Pinelopi Krystalli. 8616(June), 69–84.
  22. Rohmani, L. A. dkk. (2025). JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN Analisis Problematika Mahasiswa Non-Jurusan Bahasa. 5(03), 637–645.
  23. Sabiteka, M., Yu, X., & Sun, C. (2025). Toward Sustainable Education : A Contextualized Model for Educational Technology Adoption for Developing Countries.
  24. Septiani, D., Djufri, E., & Lestari, T. (2025). Inovasi Pembelajaran IPA : Lembar Kegiatan Mahasiswa Berbasis Studi Kasus untuk Meningkatkan Kosakata Ilmiah Mahasiswa. 10, 851–857.
  25. Shaw, J. M., Lyon, E. G., Stoddart, T., Mosqueda, E., & Menon, P. (2014). Improving Science and Literacy Learning for English Language Learners : Evidence from a Pre-service Teacher Preparation Intervention. 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9376-6
  26. Sidarta, M. M., Asmiyah, S., & Amaliya, F. (2025). TEACHERS ’ PERSPECTIVES ON TECHNOLOGY -BASED MEDIA IN ELT : A CASE STUDY IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC. Foster JELT: Journal of English Langauge Teaching, 6(3), 180–191.
  27. Townsend, D., Bork, C., & Morrison, J. D. (2018). Engaging in vocabulary learning in science: the promise of multimodal instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 328–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420267