Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 55 Download : 12

Main Article Content

Abstract

Reading comprehension remains a persistent challenge for many EFL learners, especially at the junior high school level, where students often struggle to actively engage with texts. This study, however, examined the effectiveness of the Taking and Making Notes (TMN) technique in improving reading comprehension in these situations. This study used a quantitative quasi-experimental design with 64 eighth-grade students at SMPN 1 Palu involving two parallel classes. The experimental class was taught using the TMN technique, while the control class was taught using the conventional method. Data were obtained through pre- and post-tests, consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions and essays. SPSS version 31 was used to conduct statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics, normality and homogeneity tests, Independent and Paired Samples t-tests. The results showed that the experimental class achieved a significant increase in the mean score from 49.06 during the pre-test to 80.78 during the post-test; meanwhile, the control class's score only increased from 53.75 to 66.56. By increasing students' active engagement, improving retention, and enhancing their thinking skills, the independent samples t-test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), indicating that TMN can be a useful method for improving students' reading comprehension.

Keywords

EFL Teaching Reading Comprehension TMN Technique

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Ambarwati, R. R., Ruslin, R., Zulfikri, Z., & Afifah, A. (2025). Taking and Making Notes for Knowledge: Elevating Junior High Students’ Reading Comprehension. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(4), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v6i4.291
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adeoye, M. A. (2023). Review of Sampling Techniques for Education. ASEAN Journal for Science Education. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed
  2. Al-Amri, H. (2025). EFL university teachers’ perceptions on students’ boredom and its impact on their emotions and teaching practices. Saudi Journal of Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-01-2025-0007
  3. Alamri, W. (2025). Evaluating the benefits and challenges of using authentic materials in EFL context for listening purpose. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1611308
  4. Almaagbh, I. F. F. (2020). The Impact of Strategic Notetaking on EFL learners’ Academic Performance in Jordan. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 249. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p249
  5. Aslam, M. (2024). Testing Normality of Data for Uncertain Level of Significance. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 23(4), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44199-024-00098-4
  6. Bakri, R. A., Ismail, H., Saiful, S., & Syam, H. (2022). Empowering Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Cornell Note-Taking Method. BATARA DIDI : English Language Journal, 1(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.56209/badi.v1i1.25
  7. Creswell, J. W. , & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  8. Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
  9. Emerson, R. W. (2022). ANOVA Assumptions. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(4), 585–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X221124187
  10. Fausia, A. M., Akib, E., & Baso, F. A. (2021). THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF NOTETAKING TECHINIQUE IN READING SKILL AT UNISMUH MAKASSAR ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT. English Language Teaching Methodology, 1(2), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.vxiy.xxyy
  11. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and Researching Reading. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274
  12. Hariyanti, R., Sukma, E., & Damanik, D. (2024). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Powtoon Application. In Jurnal Kependidikan (Vol. 13, Issue 2). https://jurnaldidaktika.org
  13. Hüseyin, Ö. (2019). Impact of note taking during reading and during listening on comprehension. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(16), 580–589. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3812
  14. Jin, Z., & Webb, S. (2025). To what extent does reviewing notes affect L2 vocabulary learning? Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf034
  15. Juan, L., Sidhu, G. K., & Kuek, F. (2023). Enhancing Reading Comprehension via Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in a Chinese EFL Classroom. 909–921. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.82
  16. Khan, A. A., Newn, J., Kelly, R. M., Srivastava, N., Bailey, J., & Velloso, E. (2021). GAVIN. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 28(4), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453988
  17. Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Reading Strategies on Reading Comprehension of Engineering Students. Sage Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069
  18. Kozinets, R. V., & Gretzel, U. (2024). Netnography evolved: New contexts, scope, procedures and sensibilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103693
  19. KTI. (2021). Pedoman Penulisan Universitas Agama Islam Negeri (UIN) Palu 2021.
  20. Leonard, S., Stroud, M. J., & Shaw, R. J. (2021). Highlighting and taking notes are equally ineffective when Reading paper or eText. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3811–3823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10448-9
  21. Li, Y., & Yan, L. (2024). Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 14, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100142
  22. Linh, D. K., & Kien, P. T. (2025). Applying the Cornell Note-Taking Method to Enhance Reading Comprehension for High School Students. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 08(03). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i3-45
  23. Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., Krüger, M., Keller, S. D., & Hübner, N. (2024). Read at home to do well at school: informal reading predicts achievement and motivation in English as a foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289600
  24. Mirza, C. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research: Summary Guidelines for Novice Social Science Researchers. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/220704
  25. Muhammadpour, M., & Khalili Sabet, M. (2024). The impact of an online hybrid reading intervention on the reading comprehension and strategy use of Iranian English for specific purposes students in relation to an evaluated researcher-made ESP textbook. Discover Education, 3(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00162-2
  26. Mustopa, R. A., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Anshori, D. S. (2024). Investigating Senior High School Students’ Metacognition in Indonesian Learning Reading Comprehension: Does it Have a Positive Impact? International Journal of Language Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64112
  27. Nation, I. S. P. ., & Macalister, John. (2021). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
  28. Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2025). Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Their Impact on Comprehension: Insights from Rural EFL Learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908
  29. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
  30. Permana, D., Suadiyatno, T., & Harmawati, S. (2019). Jurnal Kependidikan: Note-Taking Pairs Strategy Towards Students’ Critical Thinking Ability In Reading Comprehension (Vol. 5, Issue 2). http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/
  31. Rusdiansyah. (2019). Note-Taking as a Technique in Teaching Reading Comprehension Rusdiansyah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo IDEAS Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature. Vol. 7(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1033
  32. Ruslin, Zulfikri, Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Insights about Reading Competences of Students in Public Schools in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 06(06), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2022.6637
  33. Salame, I. I., Tuba, M., & Nujhat, M. (2024). Note-taking and Its Impact on Learning, Academic Performance, and Memory. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17333a
  34. Seo, J.-Y. (2025). Cornell note-taking strategy instruction for Gen Z: enhancing EFL students’ reading comprehension. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00347-8
  35. Siswanto. (2019). The journal of English language studies. Journal of English Language Studies, Volume 4 Number 1, 32–40. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v4i1.4465
  36. Syahputra, D. P. B., & Inayah, A. (2022). Note-Taking Technique Achievement In Narrative Text At Senior High School. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(1), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol18.no1.a5241
  37. Tawali, T. (2021). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Strategy. Jurnal Paedagogy, 8(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v8i3.3852
  38. Voyer, D., Ronis, S. T., & Byers, N. (2022). The effect of notetaking method on academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102025
  39. Xu, L., Cai, S., Liu, Y., Chen, J., Peng, S., & Andrasik, F. (2024). The Effects of the Medium of Notetaking on the Delayed Learning Effect of College Students: A Mediated Moderation Model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090756
  40. Zhambylkyzy, M., & Molotovskaya, O. V. (2021). Authentic materials in teaching English. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. PHILOLOGY Series, 136(3), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678X-2021-136-3-138-147
  41. Zhang, Y., Fu, J., Lai, J., Deng, S., Guo, Z., Zhong, C., Tang, J., Cao, W., & Wu, Y. (2024). Reporting of Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research Utilizing Social Media Data on Public Health Care: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e51496. https://doi.org/10.2196/51496