Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 242 Download : 152

Main Article Content

Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate the opportunities and challenges of utilizing the peer teaching approach at the intermediate level classrooms in the English as a foreign language (EFL) context of Bangladesh. The researchers employed a mixed-method approach to conduct this study. The study participants were 128 students and 15 teachers from five intermediate colleges in Bangladesh. The participants were selected through a convenience sampling technique. The researchers used two questionnaire surveys: the teacher questionnaire and the student questionnaire, to collect the study's quantitative data. A focus group discussion (FGD) was conducted with five experienced teachers to obtain in-depth information about the prospects and challenges of implementing the peer teaching approach and its policy implications. The study’s findings revealed positive perceptions of the approach at the intermediate EFL classrooms in Bangladesh to develop communication and presentation skills in the English language, learning attitude, lesson engagement, learners’ autonomy, peer feedback, etc. However, the most significant challenge to the effective implementation of peer teaching is the large class size of the institutions.

Keywords

EFL classroom Intermediate Level Peer Interaction Peer Teaching

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Shiblu, M. N. H. S., Akter, T., Islam, S., & Mahmud, M. N. (2025). Prospects and Challenges of the Peer Teaching Approach in the Intermediate EFL Classrooms of Bangladesh. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(4), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v5i4.228
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anta, A. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of peer teaching/learning in language classrooms. DIU Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.36481/diujhss.v.06i1.t5r9cf66
  2. Armstrong, T. (2012). The power of the adolescent brain: Strategies for teaching middle and high school students. ASCD.
  3. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Routledge.
  4. Coffman, S. J. (2003). Ten strategies for getting students to take responsibility for their learning. College Teaching, 51(1), 2-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596401
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
  7. Fitria, D., Lufri, Elizar, & Amran, A. (2023). 21st-century skill-based learning (Teacher problems in applying 21st century skills). International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 2(4), 1366-1373. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i4.409
  8. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  9. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
  10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110
  11. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
  12. Jony, M. (2016). Student centered instruction for interactive and effective teaching learning: Perceptions of teachers in Bangladesh. Online Submission, 3(3), 172-178.
  13. Khan, M. E. I. (2020). EFL teachers’ prosocial behaviors at the secondary level in Bangladesh. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3734-3741. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080854
  14. Khan, M. E. I. (2023, February 10). Applying the method of Peer Teaching (STS). The Daily Sun. https://www.daily-sun.com/post/673284
  15. Khan, M. E. I., & Maniam, M. (2021). A study on teachers' deportments and pedagogical skills at the intermediate level in an EFL context. Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 9(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol9.2.1.2021
  16. Khan, M. E. I., Bhuiyan, M. S. S., & Khan, M. E. I. (2024a). Current practices and pitfalls of ELT syllabi for developing engineering students' communicative English in Bangladesh. MEXTESOL Journal, 48(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n2-7
  17. Khan, M. E. I., Nitu, N. A., Haroon, A., Khan, M. E. I., & Nessa, M. (2024b). Moving beyond CLT: Revisiting the scopes, ideologies and setbacks of post-method in secondary EFL teaching. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 5(4), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i04.01548
  18. Khan, S., & Begum, A. (2017). Overcoming resistance to change: A case study of revision and modernization in Bangladesh education. Education and Change, 21(2), 320-335.
  19. McLeod, S. (2024, February 1). Constructivism learning theory & philosophy of education. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
  20. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Stylus.
  21. Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
  22. Piaget, J. (1959). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
  23. Rahman, M. (2016). The impacts of traditional education in Bangladesh: A critical analysis. South Asian Studies, 31(2), 467-478.
  24. Rahman, M., & Baroi, H. S. (2016). The significance of group study in higher education in Bangladesh. Journal of Higher Educational Studies, 15(3), 45-60. https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/atthulab/article/view/30169
  25. Rahman, M. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Challenges of implementing active learning in higher education: A Bangladeshi perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414789
  26. Rayman, R. (1981). Joseph Lancaster's monitorial system of instruction and American Indian education, 1815-1838. History of Education Quarterly, 21(4), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.2307/367922
  27. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  28. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  30. Wessel, A. (2015). Peer learning strategies in the classroom. Journal on Best Teaching Practices, 2(1), 14-16.
  31. Wieman, C. (2014). Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8319-8320. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407304111