Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1428 Download : 826

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT


Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) has been a common teaching model to improve grammar understanding. A videotaped classroom found on YouTube uses the PPP model with proper elicitations that create student-centered. This study aims to investigate the number of elicitation questions in each stage of PPP and its role to stimulate learning that most benefits students. A quantitative method was used to determine the most frequently used type of elicitation question in each stage. In addition, the data of the selected transcript extracts is qualitatively analyzed using conversational analysis. The result shows that closed-ended questions are mostly used in the presentation phase. Meanwhile, open-ended questions are mostly used in the practice and production phases. It is concluded that a close-ended question fits the stage that needs high guidance from the teacher like when lecturing. Meanwhile, the open-ended question is suitable for a stage that is freer for students to practice and explore. 

Keywords

Elicitation Technique PPP Student-centered

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Oryza, F., Asad, F., & Soraya, I. (2022). Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP): Elicitation Technique Used by the English Teacher to Teach Grammar. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(3), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v3i3.104
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ahmad, Sharique & Wasim, Saeeda & Irfan, Sumaiya & Gogoi, Sudarshana & Srivastava, Anshika & Farheen, Zarina. (2019). Qualitative v/s Quantitative Research. 6. 2828-2832. 10.18410/jebmh/2019/587.
  2. Albers, M. J. (2017). Quantitative Data Analysis—In the Graduate Curriculum. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281617692067
  3. Alsubaie, M. S. (2015). An Analysis of Classroom Discourse: Elicitation Techniques in EFL Classrooms. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(8), 29–39. Retrieved from www.eajournals.org
  4. Apriliani, D. (2016). The Influence of Using Presentation, Practice, Production (PPP) Technique Towards Students' Simple Past Tense Mastery at the Eight Grade of SMPN 1 Katibung South Lampung in the Academic Year of 2018/2019.
  5. Arifin, M. A., Hafid, E., & Nurpahmi, S. (2019). The ppp model to teaching grammar: Evidence from Indonesian contexts of the effectiveness of explicit teaching instructions. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3), 415–447.
  6. Criado, R. (2013). A critical review of the Presentation-Practice-Production Model (PPP) in Foreign Language Teaching. In R. Monroy (Ed.), Homenaje a Francisco Gutiérrez Díez (pp. 97-115). Murcia: Edit.um. ISBN: 978-84-15463-55-9
  7. Fitri, K. & H. S. A. (2020). Teachers' Elicitation Techniques in English Classroom Interaction at SMK Negeri 13 Medan. Retrieved from http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/39777/1/Fulltext.pdf
  8. Halim, S., & Halim, T. (2019). Elicitation: A Powerful Diagnostic Tool for Actively Involving Learners in the Learning Process. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue: The Dynamics of EFL in Saudi Arabia. 115- 126 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/efl1.9
  9. Hellström, Rasmus. (2015). Task Based Language Teaching versus Presentation Practice Production. Thesis. Linköping University.
  10. Husna, R., & Amri, Z. (2018). The Use of Elicitation Technique in Teaching Speaking to Junior High School Students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(4), 611–621.
  11. Hyman, Michael & Sierra, Jeremy. (2016). Open- versus close-ended survey questions. NMSU Business Outlook. 14.
  12. Maftoon, Parvis. (2016). A Critical Look at the Presentation, Practice, Production (PPP) Approach: Challenges and Promises for ELT. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297702625
  13. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Edition). Sage Publication Inc.
  14. Norman, M., & Hyland, T. (2003). The role of confidence in lifelong learning. Educational studies, 29(2-3), 261-272.
  15. Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). Survey review. EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal, 55(1), 80–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.1.80
  16. Vafa. R. & Rakhmatova. (2022). Inductive and Deductive Approaches in Teaching Grammar