Main Article Content
This study aims to determine the correlation between the teacher’s oral feedback and the students’ writing motivation. This study is quantitative research with a correlation method. The researcher conducted this study at SMPN 2 Kasihan. The population of this study included all of the 8th graders. The sample of this study consists of 93 students. To gain the data, the researcher distributed the questionnaires to the students. The data analysis technique used in this research used Rank Spearman Correlation, with SPSS version 23 for the windows program. The result of the research showed that there is a correlation between the teacher’s oral feedback and the students’ writing motivation. It is evidenced by the Rank Spearman correlation test results with the significance value of 0.000, where it is <0.05.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2020). Impact of feedback request forms and verbal feedback on higher education students’ feedback perception, self-efficacy, and motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1688764
- Arapakis, I. (2008). Affective feedback. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR ’08 (p. 891). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390566
- Bajaj, J. K., Kaur, K., Arora, R., & Singh, S. J. (2018). Introduction of Feedback for Better Learning. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/36744.12402
- Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (fourth edi). Boston: Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.ghbook.ir/index.php?name=فرهنگ و رسانه های نوین&option=com_dbook&task=readonline&book_id=13650&page=73&chkhashk=ED9C9491B4&Itemid=218&lang=fa&tmpl=component
- Deanery. (2019). What is feedback and why is it so important ? Retrieved from http://www.bradfordvts.co.uk/educational-supervision/feedback/
- Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054
- Hattie JA, T. H. (2007). The power of feedback. ;77:81-112. Review of Educational Research., 5, 81–112.
- Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
- Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The Effects of Teacher-Written Direct vs. Indirect Feedback on Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018
- Kalra, A. (2017). Decoding the Bland–Altman plot: Basic review. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 3(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_11_17
- Mamoon-Al-Bashir, M., Kabir, M. R., & Rahman, I. (2016). The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students’ Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 38–41.
- Marvasti, A. (2018). Research Methods. In The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems (pp. 23–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108656184.003
- Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
- NSW Education and Communities. (2015). Types of feedback Oral and written feedback Oral feedback. Retrieved from http://www.ssgt.nsw.edu.au/documents/1types_feedback.pdf
- Raharjo, S. (2014). Cara melakukan Uji Validitas Product Moment dengan SPSS.
- Roopa, S., & Rani, M. (2012). Questionnaire Designing for a Survey. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4_suppl1), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820120509S
- van Loon, M., & van de Pol, J. (2019). Judging own and peer performance when using feedback in elementary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101754