Main Article Content


This qualitative case study explored the impact of ChatGPT on the writing competence of 3rd year BAEL students. It aimed to determine the use of ChatGPT on students' writing competency. A stratified purposive sampling method was used in selecting experienced participants. The scrutinized gathered data was subject to thematic analysis anchored by Braun and Clarke (2006), revealing both beneficial and counterproductive outcomes from using ChatGPT on students' writing competence. This concludes that the impact of ChatGPT on students’ writing was multifaceted highlighting the significance of adopting a well-rounded approach to maximize benefits and minimize potential drawbacks.


Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT Influence Writing Competence

Article Details

How to Cite
Obiso, C. M. (2024). Students’ Regard on the Use of ChatGPT in their Writing Competence. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 102-119.


  1. Abdullayeva, M., & Muzaffarovna, M. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on the writing skills of students. Journal of Education and Technology, 32(1), 56-67.
  2. AI bot ChatGPT. (n.d.). AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability. uns -academics-with-essay-writing-skills-and-usability
  3. Alamri, W. (2019). Effectiveness of Qualitative Research Methods: Interviews and Diaries, Lecturer at English Language Institute, University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Ali, J., Shamsan, M., A., A., Hezam, T. & Mohammed A. A. Q.(2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students' voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix. view/51/71
  5. Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2010). The Future of Education: The Impact of Technology on Personal Learning Environments. Pew Research Center. https://www.p ewresear
  6. Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2010). The Future of Education: The Impact of Technology on Personal Learning Environments. Pew Research Center. /internet/2010/08/29/the-future-of-education-the-impact-of-technology-on-personal-learning-environments/
  7. Atlas, S.(2023). "ChatGPT for Higher Education and Professional Development: A Guide to Conversational AI."
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2),77101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa https:/ /
  9. Brown, J. S. (2009). The Role of Educational Technology in the Learning Sciences. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 259-263.
  10. Chan, C.K.Y., Hu, W. Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 20, 43 (2023).
  11. Chung Kwan Lo. What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature, 2023. Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China. Educ. Sci. 2023,13(4), 410;
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  13. Creswell, J., Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches.SAGEPublication.In
  14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage
  15. Huzaif, M.(2023). The Impact of ChatGPT on Student learning
  16. Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Investigating the potential of ChatGPT in enhancing students' writing skills. International Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 23-36. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springero
  17. Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464.
  18. Jabonete, A. M., Cabatingan, K. B., & Briones, A. V. (2022). Exploring the experiences of students using AI-powered writing apps in online classes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(6), 56-68. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v17i06.14206. jet/article/view/ 14 206/0
  19. Jossey-Bass. (2006). Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley &Sons.
  20. Juan, C., et al. (2023). The influence of ChatGPT on students' writing competence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 1-15.
  21. Kalla, Dinesh & Smith, Natan. (2023, April). Study and Analysis of Chat GPT and its Impact on Different Fields of Study. Colorado Technical University, Microsoft (Big Data Support Escalation Engineer), Charlotte, North Carolina. https://
  22. Lee, S., & Kim, N. (2021). AI in Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3),18 27. uctechsoci
  23. Limna, P. et al., (2023, May 25). The use of ChatGPT in the digital era: Perspectives on chatbot implementation, Vol.6 No.1 (2023).
  24. Liu, Y., Li, Z., & Wang, X. (2022). The effect of AI-powered feedback on the writing of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(10), 2179 2204.
  25. Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Case study research: A practical guide for applied research in education and the social sciences. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
  26. Malik, S. (2023). The Utility of ChatGPT as an Example of Large Language Models in Healthcare Education. Research and Practice: Systematic Review on the Future Perspectives and Potential Limitations. /2023.02.19.23286155v1.full.pdf
  27. Marzuki, et al., (2023) The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective, Cogent Education, 10:2, DOI: 10. 1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
  28. Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. University of Johannesburg, South Africa, College of Business and Economics, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006.
  29. Michalon & Zuñiga (2023). ChatGPT, a brand-new tool to strengthen timeless competencies
  30. Muhammad, H. (2023). The Impact of ChatGPT on Students: Positive Effects and Potential Negative Effects. on-students-positive-effects-and-potential-negative-effects/
  31. Nowell, L., Norris, J., White, D., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1).https://do
  32. Rudolp (2023).ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
  33. Sallam, M. A. (2023). ChatGPT: A new era of language models and their impact on education and healthcare. Journal of Advanced Research, 45, 100744. doi:10.1016 /j.jare.2023.100744
  34. Sengupta, D. (2023). ChatGPT is changing education, AI experts say — but how? -64454752
  35. Smith, A. N., & Johnson, T. (2018). Technology and Writing. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Writing and Composing in the Age of MOOCs (pp. 149-166). IGI Global.
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press., 2022. Is Chatgpt making us lazy?
  37. Winchester, N., Gnaldi, M., & Smith, M. (2017). Pre-data collection. In M. Forrester, C. Slater, & E. J. Teijlingen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health research methods (pp. 23-37). Routledge. oi/10.4324/9781315454322-3
  38. Yang, Y. Cornelius, & Linda F. (2004). Students’ Perceptions towards the Quality of Online Education: A Qualitative Approach, Mississippi State University
  39. Young, J. C., Rose, D. C., Mumby, H. S., Benitez-Capistros, F., D., Derrick, C. J., Finch, T.,Garcia, C., Home, C., Marwaha, Esha, M., Courtney, P., Stephen, S., Jay W., Kerrie A., Mukherjee, N. (2018) A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews inconservation science research.
  40. Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2021). The effects of AI-powered feedback on students' writing performance. Computers & Education, 162, 104037. https://www.scienc edirect. com/journal/computers-and-education
  41. Zhang, J., Chen, X., & Li, Y. (2023). The impact of AI-powered writing tools on students' idea generation and writing performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 345-367.